"Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again." (sir-stig)
06/22/2015 at 16:23 • Filed to: pCARS
0
4|
"Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again." (sir-stig)
06/22/2015 at 16:23 • Filed to: pCARS | 0
| 4 |
Whether ‘tis nobler to fund a !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! and try to explain to my wife why this is a good idea, or miss out on developing the next best rally game.
Hot Takes Salesman
> Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again.
06/22/2015 at 16:30 |
|
If Slightly Mad wants to make even a sliver of a profit, they’d better sort out all the bullshit issues that plagued the original- I'm looking straight at the at-times-massive lag, shit physics, and more. But banned race cars sound interesting to me...
AthomSfere
> Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again.
06/22/2015 at 16:34 |
|
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Didn’t work?
|
Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again.
> Hot Takes Salesman
06/22/2015 at 16:52 |
|
Shit physics? I’m not saying the game doesn’t have problems, but I wouldn’t say their physics are bad. Their FFB isn’t very intuitive, but the physics are pretty excellent. pCARS still is being supported for at least 2 more years, it’s not like they are abandoning it to work on a new one, it’s just kinda necessary for a crowd-funded studio to announce new projects when the first start development.
|
Hot Takes Salesman
> Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again.
06/22/2015 at 17:32 |
|
I was saying that, in order to produce things at the high quality we want to see, they’re going to have to fix PCARS’ issues and carry over those improvements to the sequel. And also the physics are not the worst, I'll admit, but they're also not mind-blowing